First of all, let me say that the movie poster has nothing to do with the movie itself. Then I did not see the 1985 version. But I must say that this is a very, very small but perfect film. We feel the plot of the film. The coloring is uniform. And it's a typical American naturalist film.

I have a policy of giving low budget movies like this an extra point from the '1' I would normally give. As a 'well done for getting it made'.

This is still terrible and unwatchable. It would still be awful with a £200 million budget (see Moonfall)

Just remember, anyone with any kind of camera can make a "movie" nowadays.

This is no different. Terrible acting, dumbest script ever, bad CGI that your grandma and After Effects can do and stock shots of disasters do not make a good movie.

The worst thing about these types of no-budget movies is they think having their bad "actors" have a lot of dialog somehow improves the movie. I realize they're trying to fill in 90 minutes so a lot has to be meaningless exposition but my God, if you invest in one thing in these bad no budget movies, invest in a writer. It's a given your "actors" will be awful, at least give them some somewhat interesting dialog to read.

Terrible and unwatchable. Note, one person did give this a ten in here. That person has one "review" to their credit. This one. Guess what movie that person worked on. I wish IMDB would be a kibosh on people giving tens to their own "movies" in here.

Avoid.