If there is indeed an underworld, Hollywood executives who are sent there will be forced to spend eternity watching these hideous exploitation movies.
There there a long periods of silence in this ultra boring garbage about heroin-addicted teenagers in their late 20's who use their womenly wiles to rob lustful men on the road simply so they can get another fix. The rule of thumb in making these movies what is make it fast, make it cheap and find whoever was available at whatever Hollywood dive Bar you could locate them in. It attempts to show the dangers of drug abuse but ends up being instantly forgettable because it is obviously not sincere in trying to provide a moral message. Nobody in the film is worth singling out for any of their performances because they are just all equally bland and quickly forgettable.
The use of extreme sexuality in its narrative shows that there really is no moral conscience behind this and the trouble is that it isn't even funny. None of the women really are attractive, overly made-up and wearing clothing far too tight, while the men that they are involved with are beyond deplorable. The film is also very inconsistent in its plot and also looks like it was filmed in a bunch of cardboard boxes assembled to look like a huge building. Film historians will be interested in this or others like it simply for the genre of exploitation but there is nothing to recommend outside of being grateful that these types of films simply just are not made anymore.
Girl Gang
1954
Action / Crime / Drama / Thriller
Girl Gang
1954
Action / Crime / Drama / Thriller
Keywords: gang
Plot summary
A sleazy gangster has a gang of young girls commit robberies and prostitution for him by getting them hooked on drugs.
Uploaded by: FREEMAN
Director
Top cast
Movie Reviews
A few seconds here and there of unintentional bad humor doesn't even warrant this to be a fun bad movie.
Sleazy fun.
This is, without question, a bad film. The acting is often pretty crappy (with 'actors' who can't deliver their lines),the production values low and the emphasis is purely on exploitation! However, in a sleazy way, it's also very interesting and certainly will keep your attention! It definitely falls into the category of 'so bad, it's good'!
This film is of some mild interest because one of the main characters, 'Doc', is Harry Keaton--Buster's real life brother. You can't tell this by looking at him or seeing him act--he's just another apparent no-talent in a vast sea of no-talents! Additionally, the film stars Timothy Farrell as 'Joe'--a sleazy sort much like the guys he played in other no-budget exploitation films as "Test Tube Babies", "Glen or Glenda" and "Jail Bait". He plays his usual greasy crooks--and in such roles, Farrell (a bailiff in real life) was pretty effective.
"Girl Gang" begins with a group of nasty women beating a guy up and stealing his car. It seems they are heroin addicts and have brought the car to Joe so they can get a fix. In fact, throughout the film LOTS of troubled people come to Joe for pot and heroin--and Joe is very obliging--giving them their first dose for free. Then, when they get hooked, Joe has them commit various crimes to pay for more. You see ladies prostitute themselves, blackmail, commit robberies and the like--all to get their beloved heroin. Eventually, as in all exploitation films of the era, these folks get what's coming to them. But in between, the film is very explicit for the time--with rather frank discussions of prostitution as well as how to shoot heroin. The latter was VERY realistic--and I wonder how many folks might have learned to use the drug simply by watching Joe give a step-by-step lesson to a newbie on using it!
As I said, the film is pretty funny because it's so badly made. Look at the 'ladies' delivering their line when the gang meets up with Joe at his hangout or the cop and doctor talking outside in front of the Prison Ward sign. None of them delivered their lines with any conviction--just like some semi-literates reading cue cards. Also, look for the shootout. When one of the wicked ladies shoots the gas station attendant, she then tosses the gun to the attendant who is lying on the ground bleeding. And, he then shoots the gang members!! Huh?!? But my favorite is the ultra-lame cat fight near the end of the movie. Seeing Betty White and Bea Arthur doing this scene together would have been sexier--and a lot more convincing!! Overall, terribly bad...but a hoot to watch with other bad movie buffs. Enjoyable trash.
Lookit The Garter Belt!
Timothy Farrell runs an operation where he gets boys and girl hooked on marijuana and heroin, then sends them out to rob and commit prostitution.
When the most prominent name on a cast and crew list is Farrell, you know you're in for a dire time. No one can read a line with any conviction, the mise en scene is obvious and dull, and even the sound effects, provided by Dale Knight are poor; the sounds he offers bear no relation to what is seen on screen, save the occasional jangling of harp strings to indicate a high.
Like most exploitation films, this one promises a lot of titillation, but the cheap and sordid production doesn't offer much beyond some necking, a view of Joanne Arnold's garter belt, and a poorly shot, fully clothed catfight between her and Mary Lou O'Connor. If that's all you require for a major turn-on, then you've got an imagination that sets a very low bar.