Honestly there really isn't much to say about this movie. I read other reviews which said it was slow, boring, and cliché, but as a big fan of alien movies I was hoping that despite being highly derivative it may hold some merit or entertainment value. Well I was wrong on both counts. Hangar 10 is indeed an incredibly boring, generic, and completely pointless addition to the found footage genre. The vast, vast majority of the movie is simply shots of 3 people walking through the forest filled with insignificant banter. I held out with the hope that SOMETHING of interest would happen, but ultimately gave up after an hour and fast forwarded the remainder of the movie. Things seem to pick up slightly towards the end, I mean they at least get out of the forest, but certainly nothing that comes close to justifying the large waste of time to get to that point. Hangar 10 is another victim of the sin committed by way too many found footage films (why these films do this is beyond me) where anytime something vaguely interesting starts to happen and the watcher expects the movie to pick up, the scene almost instantaneously (and jarringly with no transition whatsoever) ends and cuts to another bland scene of them standing around doing nothing while all the tension has dissipated. That's all I can really say about this one - there isn't enough content to analyze or bother bringing up. Extremely boring, pointless found footage movie that brings nothing new to the table. Avoid.

Three young adults with a camera and metal detectors go to Rendlesham Forest to look for old Roman coins and aliens. The film plays a garbled audio from the 1980 UFO incident. Our threesome get their car stolen and are trespassing, stuck in the woods with weird things happening that look like a spot light moving around. At one point one of the guys (see DVD cover) holds up the metal detector during a lightning storm. It includes a lot of night time filming, herky-jerky motion, ground cam, people screaming in the dark, and playing "what is that" game.

The movie would have been decent if the camera shooting wasn't done so bad. We know the film isn't real, so please stop tossing the camera all around.

I found the film to be a waste of time because of lousy camera shooting.

Guide: F-bomb. No sex or nudity.

Ufo incident they say ... well another title of the movie. Rendlesham or something. I didn't even research if this is based even losely/remotely on an actual event. Then again, since we now have been told that there have been some unidentified flying objects ... I mean who am I to discredit this, right? Still does not make this movie any good.

Nor the idea of going Found Footage. It is not just too late when it comes to the even itself (why would anyone go there now),but also the "genre" this pics to die on ... and dying it does (no pun inteneded). Not probing to find puns ... they're just there ...