It's a very personal drama telling the director's own story about feeling abandoned by her mother, the famous French singer Marie Laforet.

Most reviewers didn't "get" the film because they viewed it as a romantic comedy about the American dating culture; they were misled by Amazon Prime Video's terrible promotion material that announces the film as such. It seems that many American/British film distributors insist on doing this to European films: promoting them as comedies, thinking that American and British audiences will not watch a film that is a labelled as drama. So they lie to the public.

Looking back, we could not remember a single scene that we might label as "funny..." Because the film is not meant to be funny!

Sixty seconds into the film my wife and I said to each other: "this is no comedy!" And we continued watching and enjoyed it for what it really is: the story of a woman trying to cope with the fact that she was abandoned by her famous mother at an early age. It's actually tragic.

Sophie Marceau delivers a great performance as the main character, and the child actors whom play her as a child are also very natural (the sign of a great director who can bring out the best in children in front of a camera).

The film is not brilliant because the gay friend character is presented a bit too superficially and the whole ending is a bit too stereotypically "Hollywood Happy End."

Still, an enjoyable drama that raises several topics for discussion: how do you feel about a mature woman hooking up with a man that is half her age? How are the cultures of America and France different when it comes to romantic relationships and sex? How do you handle the fact that your mother chose her career over you?

Enjoy the film and discuss!

Lisa Azuelos knows how to have an impact on French screens; just see the reputation that her film, "LOL" (2008),enjoys. From that time, though, none of her movies has acquired such an enviable status. "I love America", her latest work, will most probably be the last one to do so.

With this film, released on Amazon Prime - a platform that wants to compete with Netflix, but does so unsuccessfully - Azuelos has delved into her personal life, presenting us a fictionalised version of her childhood, giving emphasis on her relationship with her mother, the famous singer Marie Laforêt. The film changes between flashbacks set in Azuelos's childhood and teenage years during the 70's and 80's, and a story set in the present, where the now adult Lisa decides to go to America, in order to follow the American dream, and, if lucky, find love too.

Like Azuelos herself, the synonymous character (played by frequent collaborator Sophie Marceau),is a film director. From what one sees in the film she is already welthy enough so as not to need to work for a single day of her life, and spends her days talking with her gay friend, Lukas, (Djanis Bouzyani) about her failed personal life. He is certainly a real friend, for he puts up with her often just tiring rants about not finding love. He is also searching for the perfect partner, and if, Lisa does it through dating sites - on his advice - he finds the desired one through an incident that makes their meeting border on the comical.

Despite the two heroes'often illogical behaviour, they are served well by the cast, and become - at least, partly - palatable. The problem with this film is its indecisiveness, since its character changes from the serious to the comical too quickly and abruptly.

Lisa narrates the story herself, and the aforementioned flashbacks serve as a way to cope with her past. Everything reminds her of her mother; the lipstick that a woman in a nightclub wears, the TV, her partner's questions about her childhood. While the film presents Lisa's trip to America as the beginning of a new life, it is actually a way for the heroine to ignore her traumatic past, that still haunts her. She doesn't want to deal with it. She prefers talking about sex or dating instead of sitting down and fighting her demons. The flashbacks show this state of character to the viewers, since they are the only truly moving parts of this film, thanks, in part, to the performances of the child actors interpreting the young Lisa.

Of course, this serious tone doesn't hold for long. As soon as she arrives to America, Lisa engages in what is simply called a dream life, having a good time in clubs, touring Los Angeles while making movie references - she imagines herself being Nathalie Wood in "Rebel without a cause, in one sequence - and going to yoga classes. John , her partner, - possibly the best character of the movie - found - of course - in a dating site, is kind, loving and understanding. Still, she isn't happy in the inside, exactly because of her not pondering her past. She wants to forget, but can't.

Aside from the film's dual nature as a comedy and a - mild - drama, the other issue with it is Azuelos's portrayal of the gay friend. Lukas is only there for laughs. While not as hyperbolic as other gay heroes, he is still, hypersensitive, irritable, with a sense of fashion that makes everyone else look like models. Whilst Lisa's attempts at finding love are presented as a personal journey, Lukas's ones bring more laughs than feeling, and the last sequence, where he kisses his partner, feels more forced than spontaneous.

Despite mentioning above that Sophie Marceau is a frequent collaborator of Lisa Azuelos, her choice for the role was extremely ironic. She had mentioned in an interview that she thinks that the most important cultural element of America is the jeans, and generally expressed her content for this culture. Her playing a heroine obsessed with that same culture is truly antithetic. Her performance, whilst very convincing, made for an a heroine that could be described as partly annoying at best, selfish at worst. She only cares for her own personal life, and doesn't show any of her friend's kindness, so their friendship seems to have been a product of luck.

It is disappointing to see the so-called "Favourite actress of the French" play in such a film, that, while not completely bad, has none of the qualities of her most famous works. The lack of success that she enjoys these last years shows, to my mind, this sense of disappointment that the French feel for their former teenage idol. For many, seeing the actress who had, forty years ago, represented the most relatable of people , end up playing the most unidentifiable of heroines, was maybe too sad. Even in "LOL", her character of the concerned mother had a universality not seen in her latest features. I don't know what reputation "I love America" will enjoy in forty years, but the one of the cult film is surely not the answer.

"I love America" - a film that want to be something it can't, whose cast desires to cement an identity that maybe doesn't suit them, with a director that has done better in the past. A film of which one of the few redeeming qualities is its relentless optimism, that makes its mediocrity seem less than it is.

The kind of optimism only present in America.

This is an exemplary film, which should be shown in film schools. It's a breviary of everything you shouldn't do. Impressive. The film lacks artistic direction. Which is normally the director's job (in France),or the producer's (in the USA).

The breviary is exemplary. There is a useless, and above all ridiculous, voice-over (it sounds like a text generated by a robot on the internet) which translates the director's inability to tell her story through the mise en scène. The film contains multiple shots, even entire scenes, that are unnecessary and could be removed. There are useless 20 minutes. There is a real lack of discernment. No one asked themselves the question of the length of this pensum?

Finally, to top it all off, the script is a pile of hackneyed clichés (not to be confused with stereotypes, which are useful for the drama),strung together like pearls and which seem to be thought of as powerful revelations... One of the ridiculous ones is the homosexual friend, very "crazy" of course and who owns a box of transvestites or similar: since 1978 (La Cage Aux Folles, Édouard Molinaro) the representation of homosexuality has come out of these chromos... The French are noisy. The runnings gags are at least out of a think tank. The cab drivers want to be actors. We have the shot on the mount Lee, the palm trees... The film is based on a dramaturgy and a scenario free of any element related to reality: the film contains no sociological, societal, social or economic element that links it to a reality. Impressive. They are wealthy and do not work. While the characters seem to suffer (we don't care).

It would seem that there is an alibi of truth, in the sense that there is inspiration from a true story. But veracity is no guarantee of drama.

Netflix has nothing to fear from Prime Video with a film like this. Prime Video needs to be careful and not fund films that are permanently weak, i.e. Dumb.