OMG, the acting is horrible, storyline is so stupid....who the hell wrote this crap? What a waste of time......

1:38.27. That is the amount of time I will NEVER get back from watching this piece of low-budget, TERRIBLE acting, shaky camera crap. It's movies like these that I wish IMDB had a minus scale as far as movies. How...how did something like this even get green-lighted? it was over 2 hours long! The guy who played the professor was so freaking whiny, I gritted my teeth every damn time he talked. I really, REALLY hope everyone in this film watched this and decided that acting was not in their future. I Cannot say enough bad things about this garbage. Please...please don't watch this. It's so awful, SO bad. Peace.

To say about this horror film, yes... its full in inconsistecies and a weatherpattern that does team up with the directors wishes, and its also positive for everyone else that wants to make film, to avoid the issues flaws and glitches that the actors, editor and director make a whole lot of.

to mend some of my damaging points of view, i must tell that this if by far an amatteur made feature length movie, there are a few things that are aspiring but they are microscopical, and the idea of story and plotline and speed could be discussed over and over. one scene has come to my mind as good, its a take where a girl if drawn into the ground my sudden emerging hands, thats really a good take.

otherwise the acting are no more than an afraid looking scriptbound and apathic motionless amateurs in front of the lense for the first time. the professor sanders caracter are excrusionatly bad, and if it was the directors intent to make the actor play as bad as he did, well then ill forgive, otherwise its a joke.

the grumpy old man holds the door open to everyone, and awards a 3 for the effort ,score and locations, the rest have a negative digit. use this as a sparring partner in '' how to avoid flaws'' when moviemaking.