Download Our App XoStream

Moulin Rouge

1952

Action / Biography / Drama / Music / Romance

Plot summary


Uploaded by: FREEMAN

Director

Top cast

Christopher Lee Photo
Christopher Lee as Georges Seurat
Theodore Bikel Photo
Theodore Bikel as King Milo IV of Serbia
Peter Cushing Photo
Peter Cushing as Marcel de la Voisier
José Ferrer Photo
José Ferrer as Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec / Comte Alphonse de Toulouse-Lautrec
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
1014.63 MB
988*720
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 59 min
P/S 0 / 4
1.83 GB
1472*1072
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
1 hr 59 min
P/S 0 / 7

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Wuchakk9 / 10

There's Nothing Else Like It

A drama/biography/musical from 1952? My wife just wasn't interested. But I insisted that there's no film like the original (i.e. the REAL) "Moulin Rouge." It's a biography of the renown French artist Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec from the 1890s who had very short legs and grew to stand only about 4'11" due to an accident and bone disease. Although he was from an aristocratic family he chose to live alone in Paris to pursue his art career. He would spend time at a local cabaret, Moulin Rouge, where he'd find inspiration for his art, as well as fuel for his increasing alcoholism.

Although Henri (José Ferrer) was brilliant artistically & intellectually, he understandably had a poor self-image due to his dwarfism, which was constantly reinforced by various mean-spirited people. Yet, he discovers love for the first time when he meets a spirited woman bred in the cobblestone jungles of Paris (Colette Marchand). Will this love enhance his life or ultimately poison him? I'll leave that for you to discover.

INTERESTING ITEMS:

  • The opening dance hall sequences are highlighted by Katherine Kath (the redhead) and a young Zsa Zsa Gabor.


  • José Ferrer is great as the protagonist with his commanding voice and interesting dialogues. His commentaries on life are brilliant and brutally honest, but also cynical.


  • The viewer REALLY wants to see Henri find true love, happiness and victory, despite his deformity, but his cynicalism and alcoholism sadly enshroud him.


  • The story is both entertaining AND thought-provoking. My wife & I had some good discussions after the film. For instance, real-life people & couples that the story brought to mind, the nature of existence as "unattractive" and unloved, missed opportunities thrown in our laps due to poor self-image and addictions, being a "has-been" and a "continue-to-be", etc.


  • There's another significant female character who shows up in the third act, but I'm not sure of her name (in the movie or real life). In any event, the viewer will notice that she's NOT embarrassed to appear with Henri in public like the pathetic Marie Charlet. This is an important part; take note.


Since the film is a biography it could only end one way, but I won't spoil it for you if you're not familiar with the true story.

The film was shot in Paris and England and runs 2 hours.

FINAL WORD: Make no mistake, "Moulin Rouge" is a masterpiece. There's really nothing else like it. It's the perfect antidote to modern 'blockbuster' drek. Disregard the fact that it was released in 1952, particularly if you have a distaste for old movies, as "Moulin Rouge" is a timeless film both hugely entertaining and thought-provoking, not to mention REAL. After watching my wife expressed how much she liked the film and thanked me because she would have never chosen it on her own.

GRADE: A+

Reviewed by MartinHafer8 / 10

The film looks exquisite

Whether or not the film accurately portrays the life and personality of Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec correctly, one thing you certainly have to say about "Moulin Rouge" is that it is a gorgeous movie. Not surprisingly, it won two Oscars--for Best Art Direction-Set Decoration, Color and Best Costume Design, Color. I am also a bit surprised it wasn't nominated for Best Cinematography, Color--as the film was exquisitely filmed--giving it a look and color that is second to none. It also received quite a few important nominations--including Best Picture, Best Actor and Best Director (among others). So, it is clearly a standout film for the era. I also suspect that the film might have been overlooked a bit over the years since, as an even more spectacular biopic of a painter, "Lust for Life" gained even more notoriety in 1956. Both films are absolutely gorgeous.

As to the life story of Lautrec, I am far pickier than most because I am a (among other things) a retired history teacher. I look for inaccuracies others might not notice. So, when I see Lautrec brooding CONSTANTLY in the film, I ask why they almost never show him smiling or acting human?! Sure, the real life character was a pathetic man in many ways, but he was a man--a three-dimensional man. Although Jose Ferrer did good in many ways, his performance lacked the fullness of a real man. He got the main and depression quite well--just not anything else. I also think that the film sanitized and over-glamorized Lautrec's relationship with one particular prostitute--whereas the real Lautrec had MANY sexual relationships--many. In the film, however, he hangs out with prostitutes and is quite chaste! Part of this, I am sure, is due to the Production Code. Sure, it was being relaxes in the 1950s--but not THAT much! Overall, a wonderful film but one that isn't perfect--but incredibly beautiful--breathtakingly so. For a great double-feature, try watching this immediately preceding or followed by "Lust for Life".

By the way, I realized why they changed Lautrec's life here and there for dramatic reasons, but he never fell down the steps and broke his legs. The legs actually were very brittle and broke doing much more mundane activities--such as falling out of a chair and breaking one of them. In other words, his genetic problems caused the break and the dwarfism--not some dramatic fall.

Reviewed by TheLittleSongbird8 / 10

Immensely enjoyable, even if it does take liberties with the truth

I do agree that Moulin Rouge does take liberties with the truth, then again it is not the first biopic to take liberties with the truth. Amadeus did, so did Immortal Beloved, and The Great Caruso for that matter, that didn't stop me liking them, especially for the music. No in fact, the only real complaint I have of Moulin Rouge is that the pace is rather languid particularly when the film changes tone, but there is a lot to redeem it. John Huston does a great job with the directing, and the script is good. The film looks wonderful, the Technicolour is ravishing and the costumes are gorgeous, and the music is beautiful. Take a look at the first twenty minutes, what a magnificent sense of vibrancy of of 1880s Paris. The story then shifts to tell the morbid tale of artist Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec. This character is brilliantly played by Jose Ferrer, who as he fleshes out Henri's weaknesses doesn't seek sympathy, though especially in the ending we do feel for him. Tsa Tsa Gabor also gives a surprisingly credible performance as the dancer Jane Avril, just one of the women in his life. Overall, just a very enjoyable biopic. 8/10 Bethany Cox

Read more IMDb reviews