Don't believe the ratings on IMDb until they have had a few weeks to get the REAL ones. The bad movies in particular, routinely have fake reviewers, most likely involved in the movie making somehow. This movie was not good. Another horrible audio score that is incessant, and overbearing....too loud, and never ending. The acting was not natural...half the dialogue was forced...like the actors didn't remember how to be human once they got in front of the camera. Other than that, it's a good story, just not very well presented. I have always hated when a really good story gets ruined by bad film makers.

The three stars is generous.

You know, there's often a reason I haven't heard of a movie. I most often find out it's because it sucks. Oh this one sounded interesting (sole survivor of a Mars mission is detained in a secret facility),and after slogging through 20 minutes was hoping there might be a fantastic payoff. There is not. I might have just skipped over it if I hadn't seen the 87% Rotten Tomatoes rating (which is supposed to mean "good".) I'd give it 95% Rotten. (Looks like the iMDB rating is much more realistic.) It is literally the cheapest movie I have ever seen. Many sets consist of nothing more than a wall and a door. That can be fine if the dialogue or script is compelling, but it's so damn cliche I was spouting lines before the actors (not characters) said them. Also, it has some of the worst acting I have ever seen. What a ******* waste of time.

I could not get past 15 mins of this film, and those first 15 were a struggle. Then I fast-forwarded another 20 mins stopping at parts I though may be interesting, that were not. This film is just bad. Really bad. I'm not sure what the point of this was or what the budget was - seemed like someones allowance for the week, but every aspect of this film was bad. Writing, directing, cinematography, sound, editing, casting, etc... Total waste of time. A 1/10 form me.