Like any modern moral dilemma, the subject could be talked about and debated for hours, if not days. Of course this short film isn't going to cover everything. My favorite part about this film is that you have two sides to the coin. You have perspectives given both for and against hunting. The creators of this film didn't portray the advocate against hunting in some negative way, nor did they try to "shut him down".

They presented both sides of the argument, albeit much more towards their side, but gave you the option to judge. I commend that type of "respect for the enemy", if you want to call it that. Giving your opposition a voice.

Worth the view if you want an introspection of hunting. It may not satisfy everyone, but the effort to explore different perspectives is laudable.

Maybe it is just not for me, but this film involves interviews with a succession of people who love nature, and wildlife, but none of whom can really explain the necessity of killing wildlife to draw satisfaction from this relationship. Perhaps I just don't understand?