It is hard to say which is the better 'Swallows and Amazons' film between this and the 1974 film. Neither are without their flaws, both are in fact pretty problematic, but both have great charm and there are a number of strengths with both.
As an adaptation, it is understandable as to why some may like the 1974 film more. While lacking Ransome's evocative way of writing, which gave it a blandness, there is more of a gentle and nostalgic feel in that film than here, which is very loyal in spirit to Ransome's storytelling. Plus the production values and the music are wonderful, the main theme in the music being the most memorable element of the whole film and a pretty unforgettable theme in its own right. This said, the film did drag in places, due to some uneventful narrative, and had a miscast Roger (too gormless) and Nancy (too old and too posh),as well as Ronald Fraser overacting pretty badly.
This said, despite having its fair shares of alterations and feeling at times on the muddled side, it is easy to see why more modern audiences will like this more. The characters are more interesting in the source material certainly, and there are additions and omissions or things that are there but could have been done better. Generally, 'Swallows and Amazons' (2016) does a laudable job making a great story suitable for film and even more so maintaining the gentle and nostalgic essence in the scenes with the children and trying to give the pacing more snap and urgency.
Of course, not everything in 'Swallows and Amazons' is entirely smooth sailing. The spy subplot has been criticised by some here and for reasons that are understandable, and an opinion shared by me. Tonally, with the action being significantly intensified, it clashed too much with the rest of the story, there was too much of it and it made some of the story feel muddled. The script does feel awkward and repetitive too often, and it was sad that Susan's character is just so bland and with not much personality due to her being very underwritten.
'Swallows and Amazons' however is a treat to watch visually, being beautifully shot with even more splendid scenery. The music score soars thrillingly yet with also gentle playfulness, the element feeling and sounding the most cinematic. This said, while it is an excellent score nothing is quite as unforgettable as the main theme of the 1974 film.
Where 'Swallows and Amazons' scores with much more success in the storytelling is in the scenes with the children, which do feel natural in chemistry and are gentle without being overly-genteel or mawkish and quaintly nostalgic. That was a huge part of the charm with the source material and previous film version, so it was a joy for that essence to translate here also and so strongly. The direction does more than capably.
Regarding the acting, it was good, although Orla Hill isn't able to do anything with severely wanting material as Susan. Bobby McCulloch and Seren Hawkes prove to be much better casting as Roger and Nancy than in the 1974 film, Roger is not an annoying character this time and Hawkes is more age-appropriate and doesn't look as out of place in the setting. Rafe Spall's Uncle Jim is much more subtle than before, while of the children delightful Teddie-Rose Malleson-Allen is particularly strong. Kelly MacDonald is a charming mother figure, while Andrew Scott shows that he excels at playing villains and Jessica Stevenson and Harry Enfield portray the Jacksons well (was surprised at how well Enfield fitted).
Overall, 'Swallows and Amazons' is laudably brought to film in a problematic but worthwhile adaptation, that is best enjoyed as a standalone. 7/10 Bethany Cox
Swallows and Amazons
2016
Action / Adventure / Drama / Family / War
Swallows and Amazons
2016
Action / Adventure / Drama / Family / War
Plot summary
Two different groups of children encounter one another on a small piece of land in a lake which they both live by. Both groups try to claim the land as theirs, role-playing as two sets of enemy pirates. While this happens they encounter another boat and a stranger, they must now work together to work out who he is and why he is there, but have they got themselves involved in something much bigger?
Uploaded by: FREEMAN
Director
Top cast
Tech specs
720p.BLU 1080p.BLUMovie Reviews
Arthur Ransome laudably brought to film
Too much BBC meddling sours the experience
SWALLOWS AND AMAZONS is another example of the BBC at their meddling worst, supposing that they can improve on a classic novel by changing it for modern audiences. This version of the Arthur Ransome tale adds in a whole lot of sub-plots, most notably involving Russian spies headed by stock bad guy Andrew Scott, and more unforgivably changes the main characters for the worse. Where the girls were keen, practical and intelligent in the book, they're now hopeless and clumsy, their uselessness played for laughs. I'm sure I'm not the only one who found this aspect quite sexist. And don't get me started on the new character name 'Tatty'.
It's a pity that the resultant film is such a dog because at least it looks nice, with decent location photography and the like. A few familiar faces prop up the supporting cast with Rafe Spall, Kelly Macdonald, and Harry Enfield, but they're very much going through the motions here and overall the film isn't a patch on the classic 1970s version with Virginia McKenna.
A summer in the lakes
There is just something a bit too old fashioned about this adaptation of Swallows and Amazons. It certainly does not come across as a cinema film from BBC Films but reminded me somewhat of those Children's Film Foundation productions of the 1970s.
Mrs Walker (Kelly Macdonald) takes her four children away for a summer break in the Lake District. The children encounter the mysterious Mr Flint (Rafe Spall) who might be a rogue and is certainly in trouble. He is being pursued by two men who are looking for some stolen papers.
In the meantime the children tangle with the Blackett sisters, the Amazons who regard the little island the kids sail to as their own territory.
There is something of Enid Blyton with lashings of ginger beer about this adventure. Children would find it fun but it has a nostalgia which seems a world away. Even kids weaned on Harry Potter might find this a bit too antiquated.
However I found this was a better film than the 1974 version as this has bit more plot and urgency to it.