It's like they put all this money into this documentary, based on the absolute belief that they would capture some proof of ghosts but in the end, all they caught was a couple of doors opening and a ball rolling down the stairs. So they just had to make a huge deal out of nothing. They tell us they've heard voices, they tell us they've seen figure but there is no proof. Absolute waste of time.

Also, lol at all the 10/10 reviews posted within a few days of each other.

"Do you believe in ghosts?" Yup. Sure I do. And that's why I sleep with a light or two on in my cozy abode.

In 2020's The House in Between (my latest review),said house is well-constructed from an architectural standpoint. "Between's" darkened movie poster shows you this right off the bat. The house was gutted when the new homeowner came in and it is located in Florence, Mississippi.

So yeah, The House in Between is a haunted house documentary that at times, feels hoary and dated. Otherwise heightened by eerie background music from Joseph Miller (Pink, Athena),"Between" suggests timeworn stuff like 2007's Paranormal Activity, a less scary version of Paranormal Witness, and TV's Ghost Adventures.

"Between" has directors Steve Gonsalves and Kendall Whelpton filming (and interviewing) various spook experts. We're talking investigators, EVP mongers, contractors, electricians, and even psychics. They try to uncover why baseballs roll inexplicably down stairs, lights turn on and off, and doors shut when no one is around. Oh and there might be a dead body in the backyard that was buried there over one hundred years ago.

At 81 minutes, The House in Between gets a little more dramatis personae as it barrels along. Other times it drags, flashes, and sort of oversells. And unless you suspend your disbelief, it could almost feel like the ghostly events might have been staged (I get that vibe a lot with various shows of the "unknown").

All in all, "Between" involves real-life people and supposedly true to life circumstances. There's hints of a solace note here. Unfortunately we as the audience member have seen this movie before (no pun intended). The House in Between has some tense moments where you'd be better off watching it during the daytime. However, it fails to not fully "get your ghost".

This will be quick. This won't be a spoiler to anyone who has seen even a single ghost hunter show or doc they found nothing but a ball that rolled down the stairs once. While it would be easy to say "hey but while they were filming this something actually happened" that's true but something you hear almost at the beginning is they have had cameras hooked up to a dvr for NINE YEARS. That's right several cameras running nonstop for 78,000 HOURS straight and a ball rolling down a single stair is what they gathered in ghost proof. This is the point that should kill the production for attention hogs and the dubious science of this nonsense. How under any circumstance should people spend money on the creation of this documentary when they have more cumulative hours of nonstop surveillance to gather evidence and found a ball moving once. Turns out that one of the original Ghost Hunters from the SCI FI channel was behind this nonsense. They did go to real scientists, the most notable was the professor of Physics at Jackson State university but how they framed his answers to fit to what this scientific travesty got under the skin of this kind hearted professor to the point that he loudly stated "ghosts aren't real". When applying what he said to this what would happen in every instance of science to nonsense would be stated "is it possible for, insert item, to move with out any force behind making it move" he would say no, and that proves that the ball was moved by a supernatural entity. This had two mediums one "professional" one a crazy neighbor who started telling anyone who would listen that body's are buried all over the neighbors back yard since she was the creepiest little nine year old ever. With all the ghost nonsense I've seen I was not ready for the insertion of ET's thats all the crazy of ghost nonsense with a side of little green men. If you are so inclined a drinking game can be made from this, keep in mind the whole 9 years of recorded evidence a a single rolling ball, they say "thats the first time in all my years of, I've every seen that, that is nothing as is this doc. If tens of thousands of dollars and nine years of recording showed nothing then this should kill this form of entertainment and it should go away forever.