When this film came out in 68, being that it was foreign, and the worst crime of all, dubbed, it was generally ignored or poorly received by the American film critics. One so called reviewer (I wonder if he really saw the film) wrote that it was not the worst movie of the year, but it will do.

Some have suggested that Michael Angelo Antonioni might have seen this film and been influenced by it when he made his critically panned Zabriske's Point. Certainly this film has been influenced by Antonioni.

The film is about a robbery of an armored truck, and the unusual circumstances that complicate matters as three sides collide. However underlying it perhaps is a comment on modern society of the time, and the idea of wanting to reclaim a lost or innocent past of heroism, even if it is criminal. This is brought out in the character of Geno, played by Jean Servais who became better known due to his staring role in the 56 heist film Rififi from the mid 50's, and I think it is no accident that he is in the film, though briefly, as his participation may mean a heroic past, but one that will not work in 1968. Gary Lockwood as Tony, was 31 at the time, while Servias was 58. The film makes references to the past as with movie posters seen on a street that would probably have not been seen on those streets of 68, and one of Tony's friends referring to some of Geno's friends as from a George Raft movie.

There is also an interesting connection made between Geno, and the adversary to Tony, named Skorsky played by Lee J Cobb. One man has lived in the past and will die with it, and the other Skorsky (note they were about the same age)has adapted to this new age, outwardly respectable, but below a criminal. He will want out of his criminal activities, though as one of the mob men points out, it is not easy, and "you have eaten off the table". Tony will refer to both of Geno and Sorsky as ugly, but the meaning is different.

ideas of loyalty are also noted. The older group of Geno's feel a sense of loyalty, no mater how stupid something is. But as it will be shown with Tony's group, loyalty might not mean much, unless you are the older man of that group, who will remain loyal to the end. Some may be turned off by the fact that some of the ones with poor loyalty are shown to be gay, and probably today would not pass muster. But this was 1968, and the portrayal of gays were not always shown in a good light. But it is interesting that Tony is shown to have them as friends, if not loyal ones.

Many have criticized the cast of Lockwood, feeling that he is a weak leading man. I felt this way at the beginning, feeling that Jack Palance would have been better as Tony, and perhaps in relation to Geno more believable. While Palance would have been a more attractive choice, Lockwood is showing the modern man of that time, and I think is the proper choice. As the film gets to its climax, I realized that his casting was correct, and we see that Tony is a man who perhaps has been in great pain and guilt, but until the near end, has been able to hide it from us and his partners, and most certainly Elke Sommer as Ann. Interesting also that Geno had accused Tony of not being interested in money, while Ann a few minutes later in the film will say otherwise.

Elke Sommer has been said by some was only eye candy here in the film. But I think she represents a woman who is looking into the future while Tony may be in the past. Yes she is pretty here, but I think that she brings out the sense of being insecure in her role of a woman in 1968, and her involvement and use by both Tony and Skorsky, who she is having a relationship on the side despite his being married. her character and thoughts brought to my mind the women's liberation movement that was just around the corner.

jack Palance as Russel is great, I like the way Palance uses reading glasses in the film. While he is introduced at one time as James Bond by Skorsky, he is different from conventional Hollywood hero police types. He is not shown with a girl friend or wife, he also doesn't kill anyone, or punch anyone out. I also liked his relationship with the local police chief, the camaraderie they have, and loyalty.

Also the film does not make us hate anyone. We sometimes are made to understand Skorsky, and wish him to be able to be free of the mob. He is also not the most cold blooded character in the film, that person is also against conventions.

With its haunting music, used perfectly throughout the film. There is some lapses of logic, but this lapse helps move the story along. Often wonderful editing is used. If this is not director Antonio Isasi-Isasmendi of Spain greatest film, perhaps he needs a long overdue retrospective.

Despite the all-star cast, this is a poorly constructed and rather uneven film.

We think that Gary Lockwood is money crazy and that's why he plants his girlfriend in the office of Lee J. Cobb, so as to get the necessary information and rob the truck filled with cash.

We see the disaster of a robbery for the thieves at the beginning. Only towards the end do we find out who the slain older man was in relation to Farris. No, it wasn't his father.

For a change, Jack Palance plays an honest person, the man from the insurance company. Give Palance's roles, you expect him to break out any moment and reveal his true nature. Perhaps, that's why I didn't like this film. Both Palance and Lee J. Cobb, the latter the owner of the security firm, are both given very little to do here. Elke Sommer surrendered her good girl often foolish roles to play the girlfriend recruited for the plot.

The picture can become winding as it again proves that there is no honor among thieves.

There's little I can say about this violently bloody action thriller that seems to have slipped out for release and quickly slipped into obscurity except "skip it". Other than the opening shots of a van of criminals riding through San Francisco (obviously an attempt to take on some of the notoriety of the much better "Bullit") and a shot of a bank van disappearing into the desert sands near Vegas, there's little to remember. That is unless you don't count the obviously bad dubbing, the constant shots of Elke Sommer in bed (playing a character obviously playing both ends against the middle),the inappropriate musical score that just never shuts up or the seemingly gay man involved in the attempted heist of the bank van who wears flesh colored pants to make it appear he's naked from the waste down (I later discovered the pants to confirm he wasn't),or the presence of veteran actors such as Lee J. Cobb and Jack Palance. The action is violent and pointless, the plot ridiculous and attempts at comedy boring. There's only brief shots of Las Vegas (with obvious stock footage of many of the famous entertainers of the day appearing there with their names on casino marquees) and the plot doesn't really involve the casinos at all. I can give this one credit for one other thing; It actually made me consider 1982's really bad "Lookin' to Get Out" a bit better, although not by much.