"The Stanford Prison Experiment" looks at a test that some students did in 1971 to simulate a prison, only to see it go too far. It poses the question of whether or not each of us has the potential to turn sadistic if given the opportunity. We saw what the US troops did in Abu Ghraib. In this movie, the guards make you feel as if you're walking on eggshells (and these were ordinary people merely play the roles of guards). With any luck, the movie can lead to further debates about what leads people to be cruel towards each other. Another movie that looks at this is "Murder in the First" (about an Alcatraz prisoner).

I recommend the movie.

In 1971, Dr. Philip Zimbardo conducted a famous psychological study which has been cited innumerable times since as a case of experimenter misconduct and the abuse of participants. This film is a dramatization of the study and the events surrounding it.

It begins with Dr. Zimbardo (Billy Crudup) and his research assistants interviewing potential subjects for a study for which the participants will be paid $15 a day. What exactly it is, these subjects have little idea but the experiment was to simulate a prison environment and see the effect it would have on the participants--both those who were chosen to be guards as well as those chosen to be prisoners. In most every way, Zimbardo and his team tried to replicate a prison environment in the basement of one of the buildings at Stanford University--including having fake police arrest the designated prisoners and bring them to this mock prison. Unfortunately, very soon after the study began, psychological and physical damage occurred to the participants...yet Zimbardo did not discontinue the study. Even after guards began manhandling the prisoners and severely degrading them, the experiment continued for a hellish week. While Zimbardo claimed that the study was being done to give insight into human behavior, his lack of objectivity, the school's lack of oversight and unethical treatment of the subjects is the reason that the study became so famous. Oddly, however, such comment about the study is almost completely missing...a strange omission to say the least.

I am an unusual film reviewer because I was a practicing psychotherapist as well as a teacher who taught history and psychology. So, I probably would get more out of this movie than the average viewer and I am very familiar with the experiment. The film does a great job of re-creating the study and the time period. Folks looked and dressed like folks from 1971 and Crudup looked reasonably close to Zimbardo. I appreciated how the filmmakers tried hard to replicate the events and times during which it was made. What it also did was re-create the horrors and the film was, at times, rather disturbing...even though this occurred several decades ago. But in the film, after Zimbardo finally pulls the plug on the study, the film pretty much ends. There's a short blurb at the end that Zimbardo and his team determined that no lasting damage was done to the subjects...though this is a completely self-serving statement and was not established scientifically. As a result, the film emphasizes what folks thought they learned about prison environments and obedience...but not how the study ended up horrifying many professionals within the field. This is a huge problem and up until the inexplicable ending, I would have scored this film much higher. Incidentally, the bonus features on the DVD (which debuted this week on Netflix) seems to indicate that indeed the end did justify the means in this bizarre study.

So is this a film for you? Maybe. It is very well constructed and the acting is very realistic. I am not sure, however, that the average viewer would want to watch the study unfolding as it is unpleasant-- but it certainly is thought-provoking and interesting. I assume that this film could be effectively used by psychology programs to generate discussions about ethics and responsibility. By the way, what's allowed and not allowed in experiments on American campuses has changed significantly since 1971...much of it the result of studies run amok such as this one!

Stanford University Professor Dr. Philip Zimbardo (Billy Crudup) conducts a two week experiment and volunteers get paid $15/day. He randomly chooses nine guards and nine prisoners. He's trying to strip away the prisoners' individuality as he allows the guards free rein.

This is grinding tough watch. Essentially, the audience is put in prison with the volunteers. The flaws in the experiment is obvious right from the start. The most compelling character is Zimbardo but his drive to maintain the experiment isn't examined deep enough. The relentless oppression in the prison is suffocating. The true experiment is really about Zimbardo. It's not that surprising that people under pressure and isolation start doing ugly things. Without guidance, Archer is playing the guard like a movie villain. That in itself is fake. The biggest unanswered question is what drives Zimbardo. His refusal to end the experiment especially with girlfriend Christina Maslach is the most compelling part of the movie. The acting from everybody is great. This is not a fun watch.